• Home
  • About Us
  • Schedule
  • News
    • Citi Sports
    • Citi Business
  • Citi TV
  • Audio On Demand
  • Events
Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always
No Result
View All Result
Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Schedule
  • News
    • Citi Sports
    • Citi Business
  • Citi TV
  • Audio On Demand
  • Events
Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always

Pistorius prosecutors challenge ‘shockingly light’ sentence

November 4, 2014
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Pistorius case – Pistorius knew South African gun safety rules, court told
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

South Africa’s prosecutors have filed an appeal against the “shockingly light” sentence given to athlete Oscar Pistorius, court papers show.

Last month, Pistorius began serving a five year prison sentence for the culpable homicide of Reeva Steenkamp, although he could be out in 10 months.

The sentence failed to consider the “horrendous manner” in which Ms Steenkamp was killed, prosecutors said.

[contextly_sidebar id=”i41NfXn3NKORoL0RqtRe9Fydx7RlrB0q”]Prosecutors are also appealing against Pistorius’ murder acquittal.

The double-amputee Olympic sprinter was charged by the prosecution with the pre-meditated murder of Ms Steenkamp, a model and law graduate.

He was acquitted of this and the lesser murder charge of dolus eventualis by High Court Judge Thokozile Masipa on 21 October.

In South African law, this charge – also known as common-law murder – applies if the accused knew they might kill someone but still went ahead with their course of action.

‘Gruesome’

“The appeal on conviction is based on the question of law,” said National Prosecuting Authority spokesman Nathi Mncube in a statement.

 A file photograph showing Reeva Steenkamp in South Africa on 27 June 2012
Reeva Steenkamp had been going out with Pistorius for three months before the fatal shooting

In papers filed with the North Gauteng High Court and published by South Africa’s Eyewitness News on its website, prosecutor Gerrie Nel said Judge Masipa “erred in over-emphasising the personal circumstances of the accused and the fact that the accused was suffering from post-traumatic stress, was anxious and ‘seems remorseful’.

“Not enough emphasis was placed on the horrendous manner in which the deceased died coupled with the gruesome injuries she sustained when the accused shot and killed her,” he said.

Pistorius’ sentence was “shockingly light, inappropriate and would no have been imposed by any reasonable court”, Mr Nel added.

Ms Steenkamp died after Pistorius fired four shots through a door at his upmarket home in the capital, Pretoria, in the early hours of Valentine’s Day last year, fearing there was an intruder in the house.

The athlete was also given a three-year suspended sentence for firing a gun in a restaurant.

The prosecution had called for him to be given the maximum 15-year sentence for culpable homicide, or manslaughter.

Pistorius is currently serving his sentence in the hospital section of Pretoria’s Kgosi Mampuru II jail.

He can apply to serve the rest of his sentence under house arrest after 10 months in prison.

After the verdict, his family said that he would not appeal.

–

Source: BBC

Tags: Papa Owusu Ankomah
Previous Post

We won’t forgive NPP if they lose 2016 – TESCON

Next Post

NADMO prepares to receive fleeing Burkinabes

  • About Citi FM
  • Archives
  • Audio on Demand
  • CITI OPPORTUNITY PROJECT ON EDUCATION (COPE)
  • Events
  • Heritage Caravan: Registration Form
  • Home
  • Schedule
Call us: +233 30 222 6013

© 2024 Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Schedule
  • News
    • Citi Sports
    • Citi Business
  • Citi TV
  • Audio On Demand
  • Events

© 2024 Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always