South African athlete Oscar Pistorius has been found guilty of culpable homicide after the judge found he killed his girlfriend by mistake.
[contextly_sidebar id=”VjoUyHdJRJQVqA5SRCiRlGhHKTBjns3e”]Judge Thokozile Masipa said the athlete acted “negligently” when he fired shots through a toilet door but in the “belief that there was an intruder”.
She said the state had failed to prove he intended to kill Reeva Steenkamp.
He was also found guilty on a charge of negligently handling a firearm that went off in a restaurant.
The BBC’s Andrew Harding, in court, says that following the verdicts, Pistorius sat, rubbed his face and slumped briefly forward.
There was not much emotion in court because everyone knew the verdict was coming, our correspondent adds.
It leaves the disgraced sprinter facing a jail sentence of up to 15 years, although legal experts suggest seven to 10 years is more likely when sentence is passed in a couple of weeks.
The double amputee had denied murdering Ms Steenkamp after a row on Valentine’s Day last year, saying he shot her by mistake.
With this the judge agreed, saying “it cannot be said that the accused did not entertain a genuine belief that there was an intruder”.
But she said: “The accused knew there was a person behind the toilet door, he chose to use a firearm.
“I am of the view the accused acted too hastily and used too much force. It is clear his conduct is negligent.”
Verdict | What it means | Sentence |
---|---|---|
Premeditated murder – acquitted | Intended and planned to unlawfully kill Reeva Steenkamp, or an intruder | Mandatory life term – 25 years before parole |
Common-law murder – acquitted | Unlawfully intended to kill in the heat of the moment but without “malice aforethought”. Either: Shot door intending to kill, or knew someone might be killed and still fired gun | Minimum of 15 years up to 20 years, at judge’s discretion |
Culpable homicide (manslaughter) – guilty | No intention to kill. Takes into account disability, but actions negligent and not in keeping with a reasonable person | Maximum of 15 years, possibly between seven and 10 years |
Discharging a firearm in public – guilty of restaurant charge, acquitted over sunroof | Two counts for allegedly firing a gun through a car sunroof and discharging a gun at a restaurant | A fine or up to five years – for each charge |
Illegal possession of ammunition – acquitted | In possession of .38 bullets for which he has no licence | A fine or up to 15 years |
Source: BBC