{"id":408549,"date":"2018-03-10T09:22:45","date_gmt":"2018-03-10T09:22:45","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=408549"},"modified":"2018-03-10T09:22:45","modified_gmt":"2018-03-10T09:22:45","slug":"fake-news-travels-faster-study","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2018\/03\/fake-news-travels-faster-study\/","title":{"rendered":"Fake news ‘travels faster’ – Study"},"content":{"rendered":"

A study of 126,000 rumours and false news stories spread on Twitter over a period of 11 years found that they travelled faster and reached more people than the truth.<\/p>\n

Researchers from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology also found that fake news was more commonly re-tweeted by humans than bots.<\/p>\n

They said it could be because fake news tends to be “more novel”.<\/p>\n

The most common subject matter was false political news.<\/p>\n

Other popular topics included urban legends, business, terrorism, science, entertainment and natural disasters.<\/p>\n

Twitter provided its data for the research.<\/p>\n

The firm told the BBC that it is\u00a0already engaged with trying to devise a “health check” to measure its contribution to public conversation.<\/p>\n

“False news is more novel, and people are more likely to share novel information,” said Professor Sinan Aral, one of the study’s co-authors.<\/p>\n

While the team did not conclude that novelty on its own caused the re-tweets, they said false news tended to be more surprising than real news, which may make it more likely to be shared.<\/p>\n

Prof Aral, Soroush Vosoughi and associate professor Deb Roy began their research in the aftermath of the\u00a0Boston marathon bombing in 2013.<\/p>\n

“Twitter became our main source of news,” said Dr Vosoughi.<\/p>\n

“I realized that \u2026 a good chunk of what I was reading on social media was rumours; it was false news.”<\/p>\n

The team used six independent fact-checking sources, including Snopes and Urbanlegend, to identify whether the stories in the study were genuine.<\/p>\n

Their findings,\u00a0published in the journal Science, included:<\/p>\n