{"id":363292,"date":"2017-10-20T06:05:25","date_gmt":"2017-10-20T06:05:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=363292"},"modified":"2017-10-20T06:05:25","modified_gmt":"2017-10-20T06:05:25","slug":"ncas-excessive-fines-unconstitutional-sam-george","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2017\/10\/ncas-excessive-fines-unconstitutional-sam-george\/","title":{"rendered":"NCA’s excessive fines ‘unconstitutional’ – Sam George"},"content":{"rendered":"
National Democratic Congress (NDC) Member of Parliament for Ningo Prampram, Sam George, has accused the National Communications Authority (NCA), of contravening certain constitutional provisions\u00a0with the sanctions imposed on 131 radio stations.<\/p>\n
According to the legislator, the NCA had reviewed the default sanctions for radio stations which fall foul of the regulations, without seeking Parliamentary approval, which he says is required per the Constitution.<\/p>\n
[contextly_sidebar id=”BEQyWOgxtC6RDWgDJH8aB6WFYAry5DGC”]He added that, despite being mandated by an Act of Parliament to impose fines and sanctions of\u00a0any implicated\u00a0media organisations, the Constitution requires that any amendments\u00a0to the sanctions would need the approval of Parliament before implementation.<\/p>\n
“Section 72 (1) (e) of Act 775, gives the NCA the power to manage and impose fines, and I have absolutely no qualms with that. However, any L.I or Act is subsidiary to the 1992 Constitution,” Sam George said on Eyewitness News<\/strong> on Thursday.<\/p>\n “174 (2) [of the 1992 Constitution), which is where my argument is, says that where an Act enacted in accordance with Clause 1 of this Article, confers power on any person or authority (in this case the NCA), to waive or vary a tax as imposed by that Act, the exercise of the power of waiver or variation in favour of any person or authority, shall be subject to the prior approval of Parliament by resolution.”<\/p>\n Sam George explained that,\u00a0 NCA had in 2015, reviewed the “flat fines” of GHc 1, 000 and Ghc 2,000 in addition to other sanctions that might be imposed by the regulator.<\/p>\n He, however stated that, despite gazetting the new sanctions of a daily fine of GHc10, 000, the NCA failed to bring them before the House for debate and approval.<\/p>\n “L.I 1991 set out a schedule of penalties in which it is clearly stated there that, for contraventions of your license regulatory framework, which is what the NCA is talking about, two [sanctions] are imposed. The first is a financial fine, where it\u2019s stated clearly that for those contraventions, a flat fine ranging between 1, 000 cedis and 2, 000 cedis, and any other sanctions as the NCA or the Authority may deem fit. It means that, a financial fine has been placed, and any other sanctions could be added to it. In 2015, the NCA chose to review its schedule of penalties, which is where my argument is,” he contended.<\/p>\n “It did not come to Parliament in 2015. They varied the penalties from 1, 000 and 2, 000 to 10, 000 cedis a day. It didn\u2019t come before the subsidiary legislation committee in Parliament, and before the floor of the House for approval, and that\u2019s why I\u2019m saying that the schedule of penalties, even though it was duly gazetted on the 25th<\/sup> of April in 2015, is illegal. It did not take cognizance of Article 174 (2). They might have gazetted it, but did they seek Parliamentary approval before gazetting it”? he asked.<\/p>\n The stations, including Accra-based Radio Gold,\u00a0Atlantis Radio and Radio XYZ, 3-FM, were either fined or\u00a0had their licenses revoked<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<\/strong>by the National Communications Authority (NCA), following the completion of a nationwide FM Spectrum Audit.<\/p>\n Radio XYZ\u00a0was\u00a0fined GHc 4,090,000, Atinka FM GHc 14,800,000, while Radio Gold and Atlantis Radio picked up the heftiest fines with GHc 61,330,000 and GHc 60, 350,000 respectively.<\/p>\n