{"id":35016,"date":"2014-07-28T10:40:11","date_gmt":"2014-07-28T10:40:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=35016"},"modified":"2014-07-28T10:40:11","modified_gmt":"2014-07-28T10:40:11","slug":"fist-bumps-cleaner-than-handshakes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2014\/07\/fist-bumps-cleaner-than-handshakes\/","title":{"rendered":"Fist bumps ‘cleaner than handshakes’"},"content":{"rendered":"
Sweaty palms, vice-like grips or the insufferable limp hand may be the least of your hand-shaking worries.<\/p>\n
Scientists at Aberystwyth University in Wales have shown that a shake transfers more bacteria than other forms of hand-on-hand action.<\/p>\n
They are calling for the widespread adoption of the fist bump instead, especially during flu outbreaks.<\/p>\n
Public Health England whimsically suggested a Victorian-age bow or curtsy would be even safer.<\/p>\n
The researchers took a pair of sterile rubber gloves and dipped one into a bacterial-broth so the outside was completely coated in\u00a0E. coli<\/em>.<\/p>\n They then performed a range of hand manoeuvres including handshakes of varying intensities, fist bumps and high-fives.<\/p>\n The findings, published in the American Journal of Infection Control, showed a handshake transferred 10 times as many bacteria as a meeting of fists, while a palm-to-palm high-five was somewhere in-between.<\/p>\n It is thought the smaller area of contact and shorter duration in the bump reduced the spread of bacteria.<\/p>\n Dr Dave Whitworth told the BBC News website: “There is definitely a serious side to this story, superficially it is very whimsical, but there is a serious message underneath.<\/p>\n “If there’s a flu pandemic then handshaking might be something you want to think about or in a hospital with the spread of superbugs.”<\/p>\n