{"id":314894,"date":"2017-04-29T06:05:32","date_gmt":"2017-04-29T06:05:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=314894"},"modified":"2017-04-29T06:05:32","modified_gmt":"2017-04-29T06:05:32","slug":"jon-benjamin-is-a-media-whore-apaak","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2017\/04\/jon-benjamin-is-a-media-whore-apaak\/","title":{"rendered":"Jon Benjamin is a “media whore” – Apaak"},"content":{"rendered":"
A former presidential staffer under the John Mahama administration, has described the British High Commissioner to Ghana, Jon Benjamin<\/strong><\/a><\/span> as a \u201cmedia whore\u201d who enjoys being the center of discussions in the media.<\/p>\n According to him, the diplomat deliberately leaked a letter he sent to the Speaker of Parliament informing him of the UK\u2019s decision to slap a travel ban<\/strong><\/span><\/a> on 4 parliamentarians, including a former member\u00a0for allegedly engaging in various forms of illegal immigration<\/a><\/strong><\/span> practice.<\/p>\n \u201cWhat is the import of putting this in the public domain if indeed Jon Benjamin respects our country as a sovereign nation? Who else could have done it? Work was being done to remedy this situation. We [Parliament] have the mechanisms and processes of correcting whatever wrong and investigating whatever accusations would have come against us. And I can guarantee you that, I will find it very difficult to suspect anyone of us [MPs].\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cYou know he [Jon Benjamin] has the knack to be involved in any aspect of national discourse in Ghana\u2026 Simply put, he is a media whore. He wants the limelight. His time is due and I think this is the last thing that he wants to do and quite clearly he could not have found any other entity to malign than the august house of Parliament,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n Speaking on Eyewitness News<\/strong> on Friday, Clement Apaak, who is also the MP for Builsa South Constituency, said the allegations by the High Commission against the legislators cannot be held as sacrosanct and therefore must be independently investigated by Parliament itself.<\/p>\n