{"id":295318,"date":"2017-02-17T17:53:33","date_gmt":"2017-02-17T17:53:33","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=295318"},"modified":"2017-02-17T17:53:33","modified_gmt":"2017-02-17T17:53:33","slug":"chraj-temporarily-rejects-petition-to-probe-bribery-scandal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2017\/02\/chraj-temporarily-rejects-petition-to-probe-bribery-scandal\/","title":{"rendered":"CHRAJ temporarily rejects petition to probe bribery scandal"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Commission on Human Rights and Administrative Justice (CHRAJ), has said it will take a back seat on investigations into the bribery allegations against some Members of Parliament\u2019s Appointments Committee.<\/p>\n
The Commission has however said it would not completely recuse itself from investigating the matter, but would hold an investigation in abeyance.<\/p>\n
[contextly_sidebar id=”XjC15ijYNtTwESdr2s9rjLEjguSgzNsF”]\u201cCHRAJ has decided not to exercise its discretion to decline\u00a0investigating\u00a0the allegations altogether; but rather, at this stage, to hold its investigation in abeyance awaiting the outcome of the committee\u2019s findings.\u201d<\/p>\n
CHRAJ in its assessment of the petition brought before it by one Nana\u00a0Kusi-Poku\u00a0Listowel,\u00a0explained that its decision was premised upon section 13 (1) (a) and (b) of Act 456, 1993, which allows the Commission to decline to investigate a complaint if there is adequate remedy for the complaint or it is deemed unnecessary.<\/p>\n