{"id":293961,"date":"2017-02-13T12:05:06","date_gmt":"2017-02-13T12:05:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=293961"},"modified":"2017-02-13T12:05:06","modified_gmt":"2017-02-13T12:05:06","slug":"ndc-govt-bought-3-fsrus-boakye-agyarko-was-right","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2017\/02\/ndc-govt-bought-3-fsrus-boakye-agyarko-was-right\/","title":{"rendered":"NDC gov\u2019t bought 3 FSRUs \u2013 Boakye Agyarko was right"},"content":{"rendered":"

It has emerged that the erstwhile National Democratic Congress (NDC) government did purchase three Floating Storage Regasification Units (FSRU), contrary to the Minority MPs’ position that they purchased only one.<\/p>\n

Questions over the purchase arose during the vetting of Energy Minister, Boakye Kyeremateng Agyarko, who revealed that Ghana purchased three Floating Storage Regasification Units at exorbitant prices to transport excess gas from the Western to the Eastern enclave, when only one unit was required.<\/p>\n

[contextly_sidebar id=”MGwOc2tf5PTfkvZWxSD6bCmnnrNJ2SIN”]Minority MPs led by Minority Chief Whip, Alhaji Mubarak Mohammed Muntaka, however questioned his assertions and demanded evidence for his claims.<\/p>\n

However documents cited by Citi Business News<\/strong> reveal that three FSRUs were indeed purchased by the erstwhile NDC government between 2015 and 2016.<\/p>\n

FIRST AGREEMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

The first agreement dated 7th<\/sup>\u00a0October 2015, is called a \u201cGas Sales Agreement\u201d entered into between West Africa Gas Limited (BVI) (A British Virgin Islands company) as \u201cSeller\u201d and the Government of Ghana represented by the Ministry of Power as \u201cBuyer.\u201d<\/p>\n

The Agreement was signed on behalf of Ghana by Dr. Kwabena Donkor, the then Minister for Power. It relates to WAGL BVI, as the lessee of an FSRU to be used for the regasification of LNG to Gas at the Tema port for supply of the gas to Ghana. This is a 5-year contract, although the parties could agree to extend the term. During that term, Ghana is under an obligation to \u201ctake the delivery of and shall pay for such Gas.\u201d Our investigations show that this was the Agreement that obtained parliamentary approval under article 181(5) of the Constitution, as an international economic and business transaction involving WAGL BVI, a non-Ghanaian entity.<\/p>\n

SECOND AGREEMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have also seen a copy of a second agreement dated 21st<\/sup>\u00a0October 2016, called a \u201cFacilities Use Agreement\u201d and this time, entered into between Quantum Power Ghana Gas Limited (a Ghanaian company) as \u201cOperator,\u201d Quantum Power Ghana Gas BV (a Dutch company) as \u201cQuantum Sponsor,\u201d and Ghana National Petroleum Corporation as \u201cCustomer.\u201d<\/p>\n

Unlike the Gas Sales Agreement the Government of Ghana is not directly a party to the Facilities Use Agreement. This is significant because unless it is shown that GNPC was acting as \u201calter ego\u201d of Ghana, this Agreement did not require parliamentary approval to be effective. Under this Agreement, Quantum is to develop and LNG terminal facility offshore Tema to perform, among others the \u201cregasification of LNG\u201d for GNPC to purchase. This Agreement was signed on behalf of Ghana by Thomas Manu, the Deputy CEO of GNPC.<\/p>\n

THIRD AGREEMENT<\/strong><\/p>\n

We have also seen a copy of a third agreement dated 30th<\/sup>\u00a0October 2016, called \u201cLNG Operation and Services Agreement, entered into between GNPC as \u201cCustomer\u201d and Kaheel Terminal Investment LLC (a Dubai company) as \u201cOperator\u201d.<\/p>\n

Under this agreement, Kaheel is to develop and maintain infrastructure at the Takoradi port, including an FSRU. This is a Build-Own-Operate-Transfer arrangement, although the FSU is specifically excluded from the \u2018Transfer\u2019 part of the deal. This time, the Agreement was signed on behalf of GNPC by its Chief Executive Officer, Alexander Kofi Mensah Mould. But just like the Facilities Use Agreement, the Government is not directly a party to this Agreement, which would mean that parliamentary approval would not be required under article 181(5) of the Constitution.<\/p>\n

The Energy Minister, Boakye Kyeremateng Agyarko, making his claim during the vetting, also argued that purchasing two more units was needles.<\/p>\n

\u2018\u2018All the studies said FSRU one put into the Eastern enclave to support the gas deficit. Before anyone could say jack, there was a second FSRU brought to Parliament, Sahara when the indication was that do only one, it was brought to Parliament and passed at exhorbitant price. The commodity price blended was 7.8 dollars per million mbtus when if you look at Houston, it was about five\u2019\u2019.<\/p>\n

\u2018\u2019 Then the processing cost was 3.3 and later hand changed to 2.2 when regasification is sometimes below a dollar; now you ask yourself if regasification all around is a dollar, why am I paying 2.2 and why am I being passed. Just as we were flaying our arms over the second FSRU,\u00a0 third one comes in\u2026so now we have three FSRUs where we need one and the President on July said the World Bank is breathing on my neck, let us form a committee and decide what to do; that was needless hustle\u2019\u2019.<\/p>\n

Click audio below to listen to Mr. Boakye Agyarko’s argument<\/strong><\/p>\n