{"id":286019,"date":"2017-01-18T15:35:49","date_gmt":"2017-01-18T15:35:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=286019"},"modified":"2017-01-18T15:35:49","modified_gmt":"2017-01-18T15:35:49","slug":"ayarigas-senior-minister-argument-senseless-atta-kyea","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2017\/01\/ayarigas-senior-minister-argument-senseless-atta-kyea\/","title":{"rendered":"Ayariga’s ‘senior minister’ argument senseless – Atta Kyea"},"content":{"rendered":"
Minister-nominee for Works and Housing, Samuel Atta Kyea, has watered down Mahama Ayariga\u2019s suggestion that Nana Akufo-Addo\u2019s creation of the Senior Minister portfolio is unconstitutional.<\/p>\n
The Bawku Central MP had argued that, Nana Addo breached the constitution by making that appointment because the \u201cnomination of any person to be vetted for the post of a \u2018Senior Minister\u2019 constitutes a constitutional aberration\u201d, adding that \u201cnowhere in the Constitution does the office of \u2018Senior Minister\u2019 exist.\u201d<\/p>\n
But the Abuakwa South lawmaker in a sharp rebuttal described Ayariga\u2019s argument as unfortunate and hollow, arguing that the constitution has not spelt out guidelines for the appointment of Ministers under a particular government.<\/p>\n
\u201cIt is very unfortunate because it has no substance and it is hollow. There is nowhere in the constitution that any ministerial portfolio has been created… So far as they have ministerial roles and functions, the only Minister who has been given constitutional recognition is the office of the Attorney General so with due respect to him, I do not see how he will have any serious argument to press home either in the court or within Parliament because it is pathetic…I am afraid his argument is jejune. They don\u2019t see the light of state. And when you say a senior minister is it not a Minister of state? Is it a Minister from heaven? It doesn\u2019t make sense.”<\/p>\n