{"id":236461,"date":"2016-08-03T15:45:18","date_gmt":"2016-08-03T15:45:18","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=236461"},"modified":"2016-08-03T15:45:18","modified_gmt":"2016-08-03T15:45:18","slug":"npp-misleading-ghanaians-on-e-transmission-of-results-ndc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2016\/08\/npp-misleading-ghanaians-on-e-transmission-of-results-ndc\/","title":{"rendered":"NPP misleading Ghanaians on e-transmission of results – NDC"},"content":{"rendered":"
The National Democratic Congress (NDC) has waded into the row between the Electoral Commission (EC) and the New Patriotic Party (NPP) over the former\u2019s decision to electronically transmit the results of the elections.<\/p>\n
According to the NDC, the claims by the NPP that EC\u2019s proposed Electronic Results Transmission System (ERTS) is unconstitutional and cannot be used are deceptive as several other rules which have governed successful elections in the past have not been backed by the country’s\u00a0laws.<\/p>\n
[contextly_sidebar id=”iUG0paS0C6vayI8iFrV6erRJBCbgvYEw”]They admitted that while the ERTS has no legal backing, an agreement had been between the EC and the political parties at the Inter Party Advisory Committee (IPAC) meeting, to which the NPP was a party, on the rules which would and would not have constitutional backing.<\/p>\n
\u201cThere\u2019s no law backing the electronic transmission. When you are dealing with elections, there are some aspects that are administrative and others that are covered by subsidiary legislation \u2013 CIs and LIs \u00a0and others that are covered by the constitution. It\u2019s not everything that should be backed by law. Many of the things, like the compilation of results, are governed by rules established by the EC. When we arrived at this decision, we indicated which of the rules would be constitutional amendments, which would go into subsidiary legislation and which would go into the training of their staff,\u201d the General Secretary of the NDC Johnson Asiedu Nketia said.<\/p>\n
\u201cI\u2019m sorry if anyone is saying that a particular thing must be provided for by either the constitution or subsidiary legislation is either misleading the public or doesn\u2019t know what they\u2019re about, or both.\u201d<\/p>\n