{"id":234159,"date":"2016-07-26T06:00:47","date_gmt":"2016-07-26T06:00:47","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=234159"},"modified":"2016-07-26T06:00:47","modified_gmt":"2016-07-26T06:00:47","slug":"new-953m-power-deal-not-an-emergency-solution-jinapor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2016\/07\/new-953m-power-deal-not-an-emergency-solution-jinapor\/","title":{"rendered":"New $953M power deal not an emergency solution – Jinapor"},"content":{"rendered":"
The Deputy Minister of Power, John Jinapor, has defended the proposed 25-years power deal with two-year old company, Early Power Limited, that will see the construction, fueling and maintenance of a 400 megawatts power plant.<\/p>\n
Speaking on Eyewitness News<\/strong>, Mr. Jinapor also stressed that, the deal, estimated to cost US$ 953 million, should not be seen as an emergency plant as it was the result of a planned assessment.<\/p>\n [contextly_sidebar id=”G6OwobKQxBU2mirtWacFhvuiv67ymuO4″]He explained that \u201cfollowing Seth Terkper\u2019s supervisory role of the power\u00a0Ministry, we set out to do a proper assessment of one, our generation capacity, our current power needs, and a projection, a five year projection in order to determine what we will require in terms of generation.\u201d<\/p>\n “…by the time this project is complete, it ties into our demand projections so I think that it makes a lot of sense and it is a prudent decision we have taken,\u201d Mr. Jinapor added.<\/p>\n The Deputy Minister further argued that \u201cyou don\u2019t do an emergency plant for over 20 months.\u201d<\/p>\n Deal was initially an emergency option<\/strong><\/p>\n Mr. Jinapor however admitted that, this deal was initially conceived as an emergency solution to the country\u2019s power troubles.<\/p>\n He however noted that, it was eventually restructured in a move that increased the capacity of the proposed plant but also the cost.<\/p>\n \u201cIt was conceptualized to be an emergency plant. Following the work we did, we decided that we stretch and so yes, the title which went to cabinet was titled an emergency plant but when it went to cabinet again, we reduced the price, increased the capacity and added on a combine cycle which increased the cost.\u201d<\/p>\n Deal reduces risk and end user cost<\/strong><\/p>\n Despite the restructuring, Mr. Jinapor maintained that, the deal would be in the interest of end users and also government, because the risk will be reduced.<\/p>\n \u201cThe PPA, which is the end user tariff of about 12 dollars, is far lower than most of the plants in the system,\u201d he noted, explaining further that, it is an \u201cimprovement of the GCSE. Simply put, we are reducing risk\u2026 we want to reduce the risk and exposure that the government gives in terms of a cover for the investment.\u201d<\/p>\n Mr. Jinapor, who was initially tight-lipped on who would ultimately foot the bill for this deal, eventually admitted that the end user will ultimately be footing the bill but according to him, \u201cif you stretch it over a long period of time, it means that you will be paying lower because of the principle of the value for money.\u201d<\/p>\n