{"id":216342,"date":"2016-05-23T06:00:24","date_gmt":"2016-05-23T06:00:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=216342"},"modified":"2016-05-23T06:00:24","modified_gmt":"2016-05-23T06:00:24","slug":"snowden-calls-for-whistleblower-shield-after-claims-by-new-pentagon-source","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2016\/05\/snowden-calls-for-whistleblower-shield-after-claims-by-new-pentagon-source\/","title":{"rendered":"Snowden calls for whistleblower shield after claims by new Pentagon source"},"content":{"rendered":"
Edward Snowden has called for a complete overhaul of US whistleblower protections after a new source from deep inside the Pentagon came forward with a startling account of how the system became a \u201ctrap\u201d for those seeking to expose wrongdoing.<\/p>\n
The account of John Crane, a former senior Pentagon investigator, appears to undermine Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton and other major establishment figures who argue that there were established routes for Snowden other than leaking to the media.<\/p>\n
Crane, a longtime assistant inspector general at the Pentagon, has accused his old office of retaliating against a major surveillance whistleblower, Thomas Drake, in an episode that helps explain Snowden\u2019s 2013 National Security Agency disclosures. Not only did Pentagon officials provide Drake\u2019s name to criminal investigators, Crane told the Guardian, they destroyed documents relevant to his defence.<\/p>\n
Snowden, responding to Crane\u2019s revelations, said he had tried to raise his concerns with colleagues, supervisors and lawyers and been told by all of them: \u201cYou\u2019re playing with fire.\u201d<\/p>\n
He told the Guardian: \u201cWe need iron-clad, enforceable protections for whistleblowers, and we need a public record of success stories. Protect the people who go to members of Congress with oversight roles, and if their efforts lead to a positive change in policy \u2013 recognize them for their efforts. There are no incentives for people to stand up against an agency on the wrong side of the law today, and that\u2019s got to change.\u201d<\/p>\n
Snowden continued: \u201cThe sad reality of today\u2019s policies is that going to the inspector general with evidence of truly serious wrongdoing is often a mistake. Going to the press involves serious risks, but at least you\u2019ve got a chance.\u201d<\/p>\n
Financially ruined<\/strong><\/p>\n Thomas Drake\u2019s legal ordeal ruined him financially and ended in 2011 with all serious accusations against him dropped. His case served as a prologue to Snowden\u2019s. Now Crane\u2019s account has led to a new investigation at the US justice department into whistleblower retaliation at the Pentagon that may serve as an epilogue \u2013 one Crane hopes will make the Pentagon a safe place for insiders to expose wrongdoing and illegality.<\/p>\n \u201cIf we have situations where we have whistleblowers investigated because they\u2019re whistleblowers to the inspector general\u2019s office, that will simply shut down the whole whistleblower system,\u201d Crane told the Guardian.<\/p>\n Crane, who has not previously given interviews, has told his explosive story in a new book, Bravehearts: Whistle Blowing In The Age of Snowden by Mark Hertsgaard, from which the Guardian is running extracts. The Guardian has partnered with Der Spiegel and Newsweek Japan on Crane\u2019s story.<\/p>\n