{"id":18221,"date":"2014-05-13T11:10:48","date_gmt":"2014-05-13T11:10:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=18221"},"modified":"2014-05-13T11:10:48","modified_gmt":"2014-05-13T11:10:48","slug":"eu-backs-right-to-be-forgotten-in-google-privacy-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2014\/05\/eu-backs-right-to-be-forgotten-in-google-privacy-case\/","title":{"rendered":"EU backs ‘right to be forgotten’ in Google privacy case"},"content":{"rendered":"
A top EU court has ruled Google must amend some search results at the request of ordinary people in a test of the so-called “right to be forgotten”.<\/p>\n
The\u00a0European Union Court of Justice said<\/a>\u00a0links to “irrelevant” and outdated data should be erased on request.<\/p>\n The case was brought by a Spanish man who complained that an auction notice of his repossessed home on Google’s search results infringed his privacy.<\/p>\n Google said the ruling was “disappointing”.<\/p>\n “We now need to take time to analyse the implications,” a spokesperson added.<\/p>\n ‘Inadequate’<\/p>\n The search engine says it does not control data, it only offers links to information freely available on the internet.<\/p>\n It has previously said forcing it to remove data amounts to censorship.<\/p>\n The EU Justice Commissioner, Viviane Reding, welcomed the court’s decision\u00a0in a post on Facebook<\/a>, saying it was a “clear victory for the protection of personal data of Europeans”.<\/p>\n “The ruling confirms the need to bring today’s data protection rules from the “digital stone age” into today’s modern computing world,” she said.<\/p>\n The European Commission proposed a law giving users the “right to be forgotten” in 2012.<\/p>\n It would require search engines to edit some searches to make them compliant with the European directive on the protection of personal data.<\/p>\n In its judgement, the court in Luxembourg said people had the right to request information be removed if it appeared to be “inadequate, irrelevant or no longer relevant”.<\/p>\n The BBC’s Technology correspondent Rory Cellan-Jones says the court’s judgement has huge consequences for anyone who publishes material online about individuals.<\/p>\n It appears to say that anyone who does not like an old story about them can ask for it to be wiped away, he says.<\/p>\n The ruling stresses that the rights of the individual are paramount when it comes to their control over their personal data, although there is a public interest defence when it comes to people in public life.<\/p>\n The decision came after Mario Costeja Gonzalez complained that a search of his name in Google brought up newspaper articles from 16 years ago about a sale of property to recover money he owed.<\/p>\n He said the matter had been resolved and should no longer be linked to him.<\/p>\n The case is one of scores of similar cases in Spain whose complainants want Google to delete their personal information from their search results.<\/p>\n The court said people should address any request for data to be removed to the operator of the search engine, which must then examine its merits.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" A top EU court has ruled Google must amend some search results at the request of ordinary people in a test of the so-called “right to be forgotten”. The\u00a0European Union Court of Justice said\u00a0links to “irrelevant” and outdated data should be erased on request. The case was brought by a Spanish man who complained that […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":18223,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":[],"categories":[],"tags":[362,18,443],"yoast_head":"\n\n