{"id":150736,"date":"2015-09-11T14:28:07","date_gmt":"2015-09-11T14:28:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=150736"},"modified":"2015-09-11T17:44:53","modified_gmt":"2015-09-11T17:44:53","slug":"indicted-judges-sue-judicial-council-over-their-suspension","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/2015\/09\/indicted-judges-sue-judicial-council-over-their-suspension\/","title":{"rendered":"Indicted judges sue Judicial Council over their suspension"},"content":{"rendered":"

Some of the judges implicated in journalist Anas Aremeyaw Anas’ corruption video have resorted to the Fast Track Court to challenge the processes leading to their suspension.<\/p>\n

14 out of the 22 accused judges, in their writ said their “suspension is in bad faith,” and that the court should declare the suspension “null and void.”<\/p>\n

[contextly_sidebar id=”plz8bIEF62NKdAPog3omdjyXxGBqLlG5″]6 of them are Circuit Court judges while the rest are District Magistrates.<\/p>\n

According to them, the letter from the Judicial Council which asked them to respond to Anas’ video, was dated 4th September, 2015, but was\u00a0only delivered to them on 8th September.<\/p>\n

The said letter asked them to respond to the allegations in the video, also on 8th September, the same day the letter was delivered to them.<\/p>\n

They argue that they were not given ample time to respond to the said allegations by the journalist while the Council proceeded to with the suspension.<\/p>\n

“Plaintiffs contend that in so far as the penalty attached to the misconduct alleged against them depended on whether the proceedings were summary or formal, plaintiffs were entitled to be informed of the nature of the proceedings against them.”<\/p>\n

In their writ, the 14 judges also argued that the investigative committee set up by the Chief Justice to investigate the corruption allegations against them, does not have the locus to do so.<\/p>\n

“… In so far as the power to conduct disciplinary proceedings against the plaintiffs is by law vested in a judge of the High Court or some judicial officer appointed for the purpose by the Chief Justice, the current disciplinary committee is bereft of jurisdiction to investigate the plaintiffs.”<\/p>\n

List of the 14 judges<\/strong><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Emmanuel Kofi Sunu<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a02. Benjamin Yaw Owusu<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a03. Kodwo Filson<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a04. Seyram Tsatsu Azumah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a05. Isaac Akwantey<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a06. Florence Ninepence<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a07. Jacob Amponsah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a08. Alfred K.A Mensah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a09. Albert Zoogah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 10. Isaac Amoah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 11. Michael Gyamfi Boamah<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 12. Paul Alhassan<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a0 13. Stephen Asuure<\/p>\n

    \u00a0 \u00a014. William Baffoae<\/p>\n

    3 of the judges acquitted and discharged<\/strong><\/p>\n

    Three Judges implicated in the corruption scandal at the Judicial Service have been acquitted and discharged.<\/p>\n

    They are Frank Ashietey Addo, Kaakyre Atta Owusu and Kofi Ahiabor.<\/p>\n

    Frank Ashietey who is a Magistrate in Prestea is said to have taken 200 cedis at Kasoa for one Torgbor in the case involving his client and the Republic.<\/p>\n

    They are asking for an apology letter from the plaintiff, Anas Aremeyaw Anas.<\/p>\n

    –<\/p>\n

    By: Godwin A. Allotey & Fred Djabanor\/citifmonline.com\/Ghana
    \nFollow @AlloteyGodwin<\/a>
    \n