According to Citi News sources, the promotion is to take effect from November 1, 2017.

[contextly_sidebar id=”PJOIZLQ88jrycJZXH4An6f9MidTLH0FN”]ACP Addo-Danquah was recently elevated to act as Director General of the CID, shortly after accusations by Kwame Asare Obeng, also known as A-Plus, that she tried to cover-up the corruption allegation against President Akufo-Addo’s two Deputy Chiefs of Staff, during a police probe.

Her promotion to the position of acting Director General of the CID, was criticized by sections of the public in light of her connection the scandal which some say compromised the credibility of the CID.

In an audio said to be a leaked recording of a conversation between A-Plus and ACP Addo-Danquah, the CID boss was heard advising the A-Plus to withdraw his allegations against New Patriotic Party members because he was a member of the same party.

Her conduct was deemed inappropriate and unprofessional, as she indeed admitted to speaking unofficially with A-Plus.

She, however, alleged that, the conversation put out in the public domain was doctored by A-Plus to malign her.

Her predecessor at the CID, Bright Oduro, who was asked to proceed on leave a few months to his retirement, cried foul and accused the police hierarchy of unfair treatment.

ACP Addo-Danquah was recruited into the Ghana Police Service on July 27, 1990, and has worked as the administrator at the Police Hospital, headed the Commercial Crime Unit of the CID, served as commandant of the Ghana Police Staff Command College, and she is also credited with giving life to the formerly defunct CID Training School.

–

By: Delali Adogla-Bessa/citifmonline.com/Ghana

The post ACP Addo-Danquah promoted again to rank of DCOP appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.

The position is set to become vacant after President John Mahama nominated the current occupier, Dr. Benjamin Kumbour, for the position of Minister for Defence in a Ministerial reshuffle announced early Wednesday.

A short while ago, governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) chiefs, including party General Secretary, Johnson Asiedu Nketia, met members of the Majority Caucus in Parliament at which the issue of who to succeed Dr. Kumbour was discussed.

Earlier, the party chiefs had consulted President John Mahama on the question of who should lead the Majority side.

Our sources say at least four names were discussed at the meeting with the President, including that of Mr. Bagbin. The other shortlisted names were Wa West MP Joseph Yileh Chireh, Tamale South MP, Haruna Iddrissu plus one other name.

CitiNews sources say after a meeting that lasted for less than an hour with NDC MPs, “a popular decision” was taken to name Mr. Bagbin to succeed Dr. Kumbour.

It is however unclear whether Mr. Bagbin, a man known for frowning on executive intrusion into Parliament, will fill the soon-to-be vacant position as a Minister of State under Mahama’s government.

Mr. Bagbin’s soon-to-be predecessor, Dr. Kumbour, currently occupies the position as Majority Leader and Minister for Government Business in Parliament – a nomenclature Mr. Bagbin had previously slammed as evidence of Executive incursion into Parliament.

The former Minister for Water Resources Works and Housing under the Mills Administration will be no stranger on the Majority front bench, having previously served for well over a year as Majority Leader under the same government.

Earlier, the trained lawyer had led Minority NDC MPs in Parliament as the Minority Leader between 2001 and 2008 under the John Kufour regime.

A number of NDC MPs who spoke to CitiNews after the meeting hailed Mr. Bagbin’s expected return as Majority Leader as “most brilliant and politically smart”.

–

By: Richard Dela Sky/citifmonline.com/Ghana

The post Alban Bagbin returns as Majority leader appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.

Hon. Mahama Ayariga argued that once the President had set up a Committee of Enquiry into the same matter, Parliament was estopped. What law guided him in this submission, only he knows! Indeed the Executive has exhibited absolute bad faith in the matter. It is tragic how pre-conceived political prejudices can cloud every good judgment.  Indeed the Speaker himself showed he was appalled. On Monday 9 July, Hon. Ayariga told Parliament that an administrative enquiry had been set up by government and it would report in 30 days. At this time, the Motion for Parliament to investigate the matter was filed by Hon. Isaac Asiamah. Then stealthily, the President set up a Commission to investigate the same matter while Parliament was considering it. The Minister then came to argue that if the President had set up a Committee to investigate, then Parliament cannot proceed. If this jingoistic politics continues, Parliament can NEVER do its oversight work. You are supposed to OVERSEE another’s work. But anytime you take steps to enquire into his activities, he also sets up some Committee and then your own members rally round the other person and shout: “we are estopped!” This is a pity.

Article 103 of the Constitution gives the Parliament of Ghana full powers to “appoint Standing Committees and other Committees as may be necessary for the effective discharge of its functions”. A Committee appointed by Parliament “shall have the powers, rights and privileges of the High Court”. Let everyone who cares to know be told that this inquisitorial or investigative power of Parliament extends from Archaeology to Zoology and encompasses any matter of interest or concern to Ghanaians and includes any act or omission of even the President. When MPs meet, the whole Ghana has met.

The football saga in Brazil is a matter of grave concern to all Ghanaians. Parliament is the assembly of ALL Ghanaians. Yet the Majority in Parliament says it will not and cannot enquire into it. Indeed, Ghana is a sad place to live at a time like this.

Our hybrid Constitution must be changed. It weakens the Legislature vis-à-vis the Executive. In the first place, the oversight role of Parliament is undermined.  MPs who are also Ministers cannot ask colleague Ministers questions on the floor of the House as expected.  Notably, the Minister/MPs lead, control, direct and influence the other MPs on the majority side. Furthermore, ministers owe collective responsibility for all government decisions and cannot, therefore, criticise the government on the floor of the House.  An MP, once elected, owes his/her constituents deliberative and representational duties by standing in their stead in the House.   Prior commitment to the executive authority of the State undermines this basic duty.

Second, it has become the norm that majority side MPs look forward to the President for ministerial appointments.  The “successful” and “leading” MPs are perceived as those who catch the eye of the President and are made ministers and not those who perform excellently as Legislators and constantly catch the eye of the Speaker.  Indeed, once appointed, a Minister moves to the front benches and he/she moves back when he/she loses his/her ministerial position. Even in the sitting arrangement, Executive dominance is pervasive. No wonder there is very little ambition for Legislators to develop and achieve great heights as known in the US system.

In the US, through the Committee and other Senatorial Hearings, inquisitorial processes of the highest order are held with autonomy, authority and assertiveness. This constitutes the bedrock of the oversight role of the US Legislature. Parliament should be a House of Inquisition. But you can never have this under our hybrid arrangement.

Lindberg, a famous political scientist, wrote of Ghana after careful research:

“The MPs rarely use the investigative power of parliamentary committees to probe into the implementation of enacted bills or into matters of malfeasance. MPs seem not to consider the full options available to them and tend to use primarily the option of filing questions to ministers in exercising oversight responsibilities. Questions typically concern constituency matters such as when a particular road will be completed, or what the minister has done to ensure this or that village will get a new school building, rather than national policy. While important matters of local development are useful, these question and answer sessions fail to fulfill the mandate of the legislature to require transparency and accountability from the executive on implementation of major policy programs”. This is a serious indictment on Ghana.

Our vote of censure provision in the 1992 Constitution is another joke.  Article 82 provides that by a two-third majority of its members, Parliament can pass a vote of censure on a Minister of State.  But Article 82 Clause 5 provides: “where a vote of censure is passed against a Minister under this Article, the President may, unless the Minister resigns his office, revoke his appointment as Minister”.  If the President does not revoke, Parliament labours in vain.  In the light of this, Parliament is a toothless bull dog and the Executive reigns supreme. Are we serious?

We should employ constitutional engineering to ensure that our members of Parliament are free to vote as in the US.  We will refer to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia in this connection: “Members of the U.S. Congress are generally elected from one of two parties, but its members are free to vote according to their own conscience or that of their constituents”. When shall we get there?

We should amend the Constitution to specifically provide against Members of the Legislature taking up any positions on Boards or other public position offered by the Executive. This practice creates a conflict of interest situation, undermines the oversight role of MPs over the Executive and provides the tempting carrots for which Parliament plays into the strangulating arms of the Executive.

Finally, it is recommended that Parliament’s tenure be changed to five years and a two-year gap provided between Parliament and the Executive. The latter’s tenure should remain four years.

We should change our ways before we totally destroy our nation. Ghana has strangulated accountability. “Create, loot and share” will continue to haunt us. The Executive plunders with impunity and the Legislature gleefully turns the blind eye.

By:  Prof. Mike Oquaye

The post Parliament of Ghana; Quo vadis? – Prof. Mike Oquaye appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.