It said the case was an internal affair and that other countries were “in no position to make improper remarks”.

The activist, who had been serving an 11-year prison term for “subversion”, died in a hospital in China aged 61.

The Nobel Committee, which gave him the Peace Prize in 2010, said China bore a “heavy responsibility” for his death.

Beijing is now being urged to free his wife, poet Liu Xia, from house arrest.

Mr Liu died “peacefully” on Thursday afternoon, surrounded by his wife and other relatives, his main doctor Teng Yue’e said. His final words to Liu Xia were: “Live on well”.

In a brief statement, officials said that Mr Liu had suffered multiple organ failure.

International powers press China

Calling the death “premature”, the Nobel Committee said the Chinese refusal to allow him to travel was “deeply disturbing”.

Germany, one of the countries considered as an option for Mr Liu, regretted that his transfer did not take place, Foreign Minister Sigmar Gabriel said.

“China now has the responsibility to quickly, transparently and plausibly answer the question of whether the cancer could not have been identified much earlier,” he added in a statement.

British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson also said it was “wrong” for China to have denied Liu Xiaobo permission to leave.

In the first official comment since his death, China’s foreign ministry said: “The handling of Liu Xiaobo’s case belongs to China’s internal affairs, and foreign countries are in no position to make improper remarks,” reported Xinhua state news agency on Friday.

Ministry spokesman Geng Shuang added that Chinese medical authorities had made all-out efforts to treat Mr Liu, Xinhua said.

The stern words are the latest development in the international controversy surrounding Mr Liu’s case.

Chinese authorities announced last month that Mr Liu had liver cancer and moved him from prison to a hospital in the north-eastern city of Shenyang, where he was kept under heavy security.

In his final days, Western countries repeatedly urged China to give Mr Liu permission to seek palliative treatment elsewhere, which Beijing refused.

Chinese medical experts insisted he was too ill to travel, although Western doctors who examined him disagreed.

Germany, UK, France, and the United States are now calling on China to allow Liu Xia to travel and leave the country if she wished.

The call was endorsed by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra’ad Al Hussein, who urged China to “guarantee Liu Xia’s freedom of movement”.

Mainland coverage muted

In mainland China, international reports on his death have been censored, and local media have carried virtually no reports apart from sparse coverage in English, correspondents say.

Communist Party mouthpiece Global Times said in an English editorial that Mr Liu was “a victim led astray” by the West.

“The Chinese side has been focusing on Liu’s treatment, but some Western forces are always attempting to steer the issue in a political direction, hyping the treatment as a ‘human rights’ issue,” the newspaper added.

Online in China, many comments on his death on social media appear to have been censored.

Mr Liu’s friends in China have been told by authorities not to organise any memorial events according to Germany-based activist Tienchi Martin-Liao, who told the BBC that “many have been detained already”.

Outside of the mainland, Chinese activists have been openly mourning him.

Who was he?

A university professor turned tireless rights campaigner, Mr Liu was branded a criminal by authorities, and repeatedly jailed throughout his life.

Liu Xiaobo played a significant role in saving lives in the Tiananmen Square student protests of June 1989, which ended in bloodshed when they were quashed by government troops.

• The life of Liu Xiaobo

The 11-year jail term he was serving was handed down in 2009 after he compiled, with other intellectuals, the Charter 08 manifesto which called for multi-party democracy.

Mr Liu was found guilty of trying to overthrow the state.

–

Source: BBC

The post China rejects foreign criticism over Liu Xiaobo death appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.

The Chinese intellectual and activist, who championed non-violent resistance as a way of overcoming “forceful tyranny”, is the first Nobel peace prize winner to die in custody since German pacifist Carl von Ossietzky, the 1935 recipient, who died under surveillance after years confined to Nazi concentration camps.

Liu was diagnosed with late-stage liver cancer in May, while serving an 11-year sentence for his involvement in a pro-democracy manifesto called Charter 08 that called for an end to China’s one-party rule.

Last month he was granted medical parole and moved to a hospital in northeastern China, where he was reportedly treated in an isolated ward under armed guard.

World leaders, including the German chancellor, Angela Merkel, and Taiwan’s president, Tsai Ing-wen, had urged China to allow the dying dissident to travel overseas to receive medical care that supporters claimed could have prolonged his life. But China refused, prompting criticism that its Communist party’s leaders were wilfully and intentionally shortening the dissident’s life in order to deny him one last opportunity to denounce their rule.

On Thursday night authorities in the northeastern city of Shenyang, where he was being treated, confirmed his death in a short statement.

News of Liu’s death sparked an immediate outpouring of grief and condemnation of the way he had been treated. Liu’s peaceful activism and biting criticism of one-party rule meant he had spent almost a quarter of his life behind bars.

“It is so hard. I don’t know if I can say anything,” said Tienchi Martin-Liao, a longtime friend, breaking down in tears as she learned of Liu Xiaobo’s death
“I hate this government… I am furious and lots of people share my feeling. It is not only sadness – it is fury. How can a regime treat a person like Liu Xiaobo like this? I don’t have the words to describe it.
“This is unbearable. This will go down in history. No-one should forgot what this government and the Xi Jinping administration has done. It is unforgivable. It is really unforgivable.”

“Liu Xiaobo is immortal, no matter whether he is alive or dead,” said Hu Ping, a friend of almost three decades who edits a pro-democracy journal called the Beijing Spring. “Liu Xiaobo is a man of greatness, a saint.”

Patrick Poon, an Amnesty International campaigner who also knew Liu, hit out at Beijing’s “incomprehensible” persecution of someone he remembered as a kind and principled man: “He represents the sad reality of being a political dissident in China … We will definitely remember him for ever.”

Eva Pils, an expert in Chinese law and human rights from King’s College London, said that while Beijing bristled at comparisons between Liu and Ossietzky, “in a way, unfortunately, this ending reinforces that comparison – because effectively they have just let him die in their care”.

Pils added: “It’s a grim ending.”

Hu said his friend’s plight highlighted the bleak realities facing activists living under President Xi Jinping, who has presided over what observers call the most severe political chill since the days following the 1989 Tiananmen crackdown.

“I think the situation in China now is deteriorating – and the way in which Liu has been treated clearly shows us what the current situation is, and how it goes beyond our imagination.”

Born in the northern province of Jilin in 1955, Liu was part of the first generation of Chinese students to go to university after they reopened following the upheaval of Mao Zedong’s Cultural Revolution. He studied Chinese literature and went on to become a revered writer and public intellectual.

When pro-democracy protests broke out in Beijing in the spring of 1989, Liu was lecturing in New York but decided to return despite having previously shown little interest in politics.

“He thought: ‘This is where I should be and this is where I can make a contribution. So I am going there’,” said Perry Link, a Chinese literature expert from the University of California, Riverside, who knew him.

Liu flew back to Beijing and headed to Tiananmen Square, where he played a central role in the protests. He led a hunger strike shortly before the 4 June military crackdown in which hundreds, possibly thousands of lives were lost. He was jailed for almost two years for his role in what Beijing called “counter-revolutionary” riots. The experience served as a political awakening that transformed Liu into a lifelong activist and champion of democracy.

Over the coming years Liu continued to speak out, despite two more stints behind bars, railing incessantly against China’s authoritarian regime in essays and interviews. Link described Liu as a “Gandhian type” who was committed to peaceful resistance but who wrote “with clearly no fear of what might befall him”.

He was also a serious intellect. Link said he had been “smitten by the range” of topics covered in his friend’s texts, which covered everything from Chinese humour, to the history of sex, Confucian philosophy, Olympic gold medals, Obama’s first election and even poems about St Augustine and Emanuel Kant.

The “crime” that lead to Liu spending his final years behind bars was Charter 08, a 2008 declaration inspired by Charter 77, a manifesto published by Czechoslovakian dissidents in 1977. “The current system has become backward to the point that change cannot be avoided,” it warned, calling for an end to one-party rule.

Authorities did not approve. Hours before it was due to be published, Liu, who had been one of the document’s drafters, was detained at his Beijing home. The following year he was handed an 11-year sentence for “inciting subversion of state power”.

“The charter was the first public document since 1949 to dare to mention the end of one-party rule,” said Link. “But of course the problem with having an influence is that the crackdown has been effective. A lot of young people don’t know about the charter and don’t know about Liu Xiaobo now.”

In 2010, Liu was awarded the Nobel peace prize for his “long and non-violent struggle for fundamental human rights in China”. He was represented at the award ceremony by an empty chair. When he was informed of his victory he reportedly said: “I dedicate this prize to the lost souls of 4 June,” in reference to the victims of the Tiananmen massacre.

Human rights and democracy campaigners saw Liu’s Nobel prize as a triumph for their cause. But for his wife, the poet and artist Liu Xia, with whom he had fallen in love during the 1990s, it was a catastrophe. She was immediately placed under house arrest and has spent recent years living in almost total isolation, under constant surveillance.

“She is a wonderful woman. A really wonderful woman,” says Jean-Philippe Béja, a French academic and longstanding friend. “I don’t even dare to imagine how she feels now.”

Pils said Liu would be remembered for his “wise and forceful” style of political resistance. Supporters had been counting the days until his expected release from prison in 2019. “Now this is extremely disappointing. Naturally, I, like many others, had been counting down to the time of his release. It’s so unfair.”

Link said Liu would be remembered as “a stubborn truth-teller” and someone who opened “the possibility of a different kind of China”.

“That is a lasting legacy. The model of how an independent intellectual stands up to the state will be admired if it is not completely obliterated.”

Béja said Liu’s ideas would continue to inspire, long after his death. “It’s always very hard to evaluate the impact of a thinker or of an actor but I am sure that – despite all the efforts by the party – he won’t be forgotten.”

–

Source: Guardian UK

The post Nobel laureate, Liu Xiaobo dies at 61 appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.