The NPP had earlier accused the company of handing the printing plates of the presidential ballot paper to a man believed to be an official of the NDC.

Some members of the NPP subsequently picketed at the offices in protest of the suspected activity.

Though Innolink has denied the said allegations, the NPP is insisting the company is conniving with the NDC to carry out the said activity.

The party in response to a press conference held by Innolink to clarify issues , also gave its own report on the development.

The statement below captures the NPP’s report

RESPONSE FROM THE NEW PATRIOTIC PARTY TO THE PRESS CONFERENCE BY INNOLINK PRINTING PRESS ON THE  SECURITY  BREACH IN THE BALLOT PRINTING.

We have taken note of a press conference organized by the Innolink Printing House on the incident of an alleged security breach which occurred on Monday 21st November 2016, in which a senior staff of the Innolink Printing house handed over a production plate to an unknown man.

It still remains a fact that Mr. Martin Anderson (Production Manager of Innolink) handed over the said plate to someone and this has not been denied by the Printing house. We believe the manner in which this was done amounts to a security breach.

The explanation is that the plate was prepared by Innolink for Aerovote, another security printing firm which is in charge of printing the Statement of Poll and Results Declaration Forms, otherwise known as the Pink Sheets.
This is most worrying because Aerovote is supposed to be an A1 security printing house, awarded the contract to print arguably the most sensitive document in the entire election process, the Pink Sheets. If such a firm does not have the capacity to make or fix its own printing plates but to rely on another firm then we consider this as a fundamental breach which compromises the integrity of the entire work that it is doing.  It is this same Aerovote that, through a subcontract in 2012, was given the very odd task to print duplicated serial numbers on duplicate pink sheets for the 2012 presidential elections.  This ended up at the Supreme Court with evidence that Pink Sheets were replaced with new results before collation took place.

We, therefore, do not take this matter lightly at all and believe should be one of grave concern to the Electoral Commission requiring an IPAC meeting.

Below is our report on the matter:
1. When Political Party agents reported at that printing press on the 3rd of November 2016 to begin the Printing, the rule spelt out to them was that there was to be no other printing or activity during the period apart from the printing of Parliamentary and Presidential ballot papers.

2. At no point were the agents present at the Printing House made aware of a printing plate leaving Innolink. It was all being done on the blindside of the agents. It took the extra vigilance of our agents to detect that a plate had been handed out to an unknown person. Were the BNI agents and Police representatives aware of this?

3. For the avoidance of doubt, our agents are there to observe and report to us anything necessary, especially so when they feel suspicious of a particular activity. They certainly could not have glossed over seeing a security printing plate being taken out of the printing house during the period of printing ballot papers. In fact this was after all the ballots had been printed but yet to be totally distributed and accounted for before the plates used could be destroyed and in the presence of all party agents.

4. When the matter was brought to the party’s attention, the NPP Director of Elections inquired from the production manager of Innolink exactly what had been given out by him. He was unable to tell exactly what he had handed out to the man until after about ten minutes. According to the owner of Innolink he was only informed about the claim that Innolink was working on a plate for Aerovote only after our agents raised the alarm. In fact Mr Andersson, (the production manager) had to end the phone call with our Director of Elections abruptly and without being able to explain what the plate was and had to call back later with an answer to what it really was. Is it at this point that he realized  that what he gave out was a plate from Aerovote? Luckily, both phone conversations were recorded and we are happy to release this for the general public to make up their own minds.

5. We find point seven (7) of the Innolink stated facts inconsistent with paragraph five (5) of their statement. Whereas in the fifth paragraph Innolink alludes to the Director of Election’s allegation of one of their officers handing over what looks like the plate of a Presidential Ballot paper to an unknown man, the company has turned around to claim the representatives of the NPP in a meeting denied ever telling the Director of Elections that the plate sent out was Presidential Ballot Plate. At least nobody has stated categorically so and hence the request for the matter to be investigated and the full facts established. We will happily hand over the recordings we have.

6. You, Innolink, have again claimed within media circles that the NPP through its agents apologized over this issue. Again this is false. Our agents completely deny this. In any case how could agents apologize on behalf of the party for a matter that has been taken up on the national level?

AEROVOTE

As a security printing company, the situation demands that you have everything under your care and control. It is very worrying to learn that the printing plate of a document as sensitive as the Statement of Poll and Declaration of Results could be sent over the internet with all the associated risks of compromise. Are there any other possible destinations?

We are even not too sure the claim that the plate given out was not a ballot plate is true because we have not been shown anything otherwise. The Police is yet to tell us anything they have done.

We maintain that this incident has compromised the printing of either one or two of the most sensitive materials for the elections, ballot papers and Pink Sheets. We demand a full and early investigation into this matter . We will not sit unconcerned for the kind of irregularities that took place in 2012 to be repeated.  The peace and credibility of our democracy are very important to us.

…Signed…
Martin Adjei- Mensah Korsah
( Director of Elections)

–

By: Marian Ansah/citifmonline.com/Ghana
Follow @EfeAnsah

The post Investigate ‘illegal’ printing of ballot papers – NPP appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.

The company will later today [Thursday] incinerate the plates, numbering 621, under scrutiny of stakeholders.

The Head of Marketing for Innolink limited, Michael Quartson revealed to Citi News’ Philip Nii Lartey that the incineration will take place at a location behind the International Central Gospel Church (ICGC) in Accra.

According to him, the police, Electoral Commission (EC) officials, political party representatives, officials from Bureau of National Investigations (BNI) and National Security will accompany the plates to the site for incineration.

“After destroying them and burning them in their presence, when they are satisfied that everything is burnt, then we issue out a certificate of destruction and they all sign indicating that everything has been burned,” Mr. Quarterson noted.

Innolink had earlier this week been at the centre of allegations of rigging from the opposition New Patriotic Party (NPP) party.

The party alleged that the plates used for printing the ballot papers were sneaked out by an official of Innolink to be given to an unknown person, which they said is unlawful and a breach of the process.

Some NPP members subsequently picketed at the offices of the company in protest.

But Innolink denied conniving with the governing National Democratic Congress (NDC) to rig the polls. According to the company, the allegations were false and must be disregarded.

–

By: Delali Adogla-Bessa/citifmonline.com/Ghana

The post Parties to supervise incineration of ballot printing plates appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.