Yes, it was a fun-filled campaign backed by powerful slogans and massive resources. We all believed and worked for it. Then the sad reality dawned on us that sloganeering and money alone don’t win elections.

John Mahama lost the election needlessly and we must think honestly as we move forward. I know many who feel indebted or so close to him that it’s hard to see otherwise. I can’t fault their loyalty. Many of these political neophytes had their major life changing experiences under John Mahama and so it is perfectly alright for them to hear no evil, see no evil, and speak no evil just so they can continue to keep their ‘trailer park king.’
But then again, the test of loyalty is never to just blindly agree with someone, rather to speak up when they screw up.

I’ve had my own issues with Prof Mills as a leader of the NDC but he left behind a vibrant and solid electoral machinery. Indeed, the horse that was handed over to John Mahama was an agile one. It wasn’t lame as we are being told. Perhaps, we had an overfed jockey who lost track of himself.

This is man who went into the 2012 elections as vice president/President after the demise of the sitting president. He campaigned for little over 3 months and won a pyrrhic victory.

Four years on in 2016, he run on his own records as President with all the advantages of incumbency, and lost in a humiliating fashion with over one million vote margin.

I am completely taken aback by folks who still believes we actually run a winning campaign and lost. Maybe they just don’t know any better. We did not run a winning campaign. Opulence and money was not enough and in many instances very harmful to our cause. We were grossly outclassed by the then opposition on all fronts. Our messaging was off in many areas and for the first time in the history of NDC politics, the candidate isolated himself from the party machinery, forgetting that he could never have succeeded as an independent candidate and that whatever he represent was possible because of the party.

The refrain at the time was; “Mahama’s popularity has won the elections,” “the president has won already.” And our over reliance on this made us bankrupt of thinking. The candidate himself was unwilling to listen to voices other than those in his inner circle. Tried and tested ‘Generals’ and senior cadres who have seen it all were told to take a back seat because Mahama’s popularity alone was enough.

One would have thought that the Kwesi Botchway ‘corpse dressing’ committee report will prop Mahama up in a different direction, but not at all.

John Mahama is doing the same things that caused him the election. I see the same silly sycophantic behaviour by those scheming to stage his comeback. The know-it-all arrogant Mahama hangers-on are doing the same Mahama image politics which failed abysmally in the last election. Even Mahama’s own public utterances shows he has no remorse for the loss. Listen to his unexciting justifications – we lost the elections as a result of ‘multifaceted reasons. Then came his refuge in ‘global trend,’ ‘act of God and ‘incumbency disadvantage’- whatever that means, only Mahama knows. But really, if indeed the loss was due to all these factors, why are we out there on reorganization mission? Why is Mahama telling us that the horse is lame and needs resuscitation? This sort of scapegoating and willful ignorance is so malicious, and folks must get it.

There is no point applying clean band-aid for a rather infected wound. We need serious antibiotics to get rid of the infection.

The damage caused to the John Mahama product is beyond repairs. The issues that led to the rejection of Mahama at the polls in 2016 are still hot on the lips of the average Ghanaian. Indeed, the current government has started some processes aimed at nailing a few of Mahama appointees so as to justify the corruption rhetoric they put out during the campaign.

People should wake up and smell the coffee, and stop fabricating false narratives existing in an alternative reality to push for Mahama comeback. It won’t help anyone but rather sink the party further.

For me, Mahama brings virtually nothing to the table as a candidate in 2020, looking at how he reduced our electoral fortunes from 50.7 in 2012 to 44.4 in 2016 as a sitting president. If you lose miserably by that margin as President, how can you possibly overturn that in opposition?

It will be a huge gamble for NDC to bring back Mahama as the party’s presidential candidate for 2020, because if he loses (which is very probable), it means more years in opposition for the NDC.
Then again, if he losses 2020, will he return in 2024? And will this not further tear the party apart? Shouldn’t we be looking at two-term candidate instead of just one-term candidate?
It will be better for the NDC to lose 2020 with a ‘fresh candidate’ and come back stronger in 2024 than to lose 2020 with Mahama as candidate.

Our party is in need of a strong center and a leader that would be acceptable by all.

Let’s not engage in a needless battle with reality. Mashed potatoes will never look good and so John Mahama should just admit the wrongs, get behind and let a new candidate do a mob up. Then the NDC can have a clear way.

–

By: Dela Coffie

The post Why I’m against John Mahama’s 2020 presidential bid (Part 1)! [Article] appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.

Honourable Bagbin is wildly popular. His name recognition in Ghana is through the roof. As a seasoned politician and henchman for the NDC especially within parliament over the past decades, his name is immediately recognizable. Mr. Bagbin would easily pass one of the first tests in campaign politics that many unknown, fresh-faced or little know politicians face: the name recognition or popularity test. He has a constituency and a base to start from though he would have to strengthen his party machinery reach. Bagbin would start the race extremely well known.

Experience

There are very few politicians in this country with the kind of experience Bagbin boasts of. His legislative track record is unmatchable; his executive experience is doubtless and his political skills are well honed. Mr. Bagbin will come to the presidency with quite a long CV and an enviable track record.

Substantive

Mr Bagbin is no lightweight. He has earned his stripes as a serious player since his hey days as a minority leader in the Kufuor era. Some will remember his famous statement to the late Right. Hon. Speaker Peter Alan Adjetey “…. We will go after him”. To be honest, Honourable Bagbin belongs to the golden era of Ghana’s parliament. He is intelligent. He is knowledgeable. He is assertive. He will come to the presidency with a great deal of insights about the workings of our country.

Oratory

If communication is central to unlocking the goodies of the political world then Bagbin has got the keys. He speaks clearly, simply but brightly. He is quite a natural in varying forms of political communication: whether in the media, on the legislative floor or on the political podium. He is never one to disappoint. These skills will serve him well on the campaign platform and certainly at the presidency where language and persuasion are key.

Con: The case against Bagbin

Establishment candidate and old school

Mr. Bagbin has pretty much been part and parcel of the old political class in Ghana. For many looking forward to a break from the past, he will come off as stale. Bagbin will struggle with this class of voters.

Going Rogue

There was a time, not too far off actually, when Bagbin was anti-establishment. He famously called his own government—the Mahama regime—the government of family and friends. That is not all. He has gone on to make some pretty “controversial statements” (example: “President is naked” saga) which could come back to haunt him. In a party primary with long memories, people don’t easily forget—or forgive.

The Northern factor

The NDC’s most recent presidential candidate was from the Northern region. Their leader in parliament, a very strong position for a party in opposition, is from the Northern sector. The vibe you get from the party especially post-election 2016 is the idea that some hard core grassroots members would want to take a different turn by breaking a perceived “Northern” stranglehold. This may seriously hamper Bagbin’s chances.

Charisma

Hon. Bagbin has a ready smile, is not too stack up and releases some good measure of humour every now and again but he is not as widely charismatic as J.J Rawlings or John Mahama. Maybe it’s got something to do with his storied legislative image where house affairs mostly turn dense and technical. Bagbin immediately reminds one of former US Congressman and House Speaker Newt Gingrich:  fierce debater, great oratory and widely knowledgeable but limited in charisma. This is important if he has to connect or electrify.

–

By: Dr. Etse Sikanku

The post Contemplating a Bagbin presidency: a Pro-Con Analysis [Article] appeared first on Citi 97.3 FM - Relevant Radio. Always.