{"id":67449,"date":"2014-11-22T10:13:55","date_gmt":"2014-11-22T10:13:55","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=67449"},"modified":"2014-11-22T10:13:55","modified_gmt":"2014-11-22T10:13:55","slug":"apple-450-million-e-book-settlement-gets-final-court-approval","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=67449","title":{"rendered":"Apple $450 million e-book settlement gets final court approval"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A U.S. judge on Friday gave final approval to Apple agreement to pay $450 million to resolve claims it harmed consumers by conspiring with five publishers to raise e-book prices.<\/p>\n<p>During a hearing in Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote approved what she called a &#8220;highly unusual&#8221; accord. It calls for Apple to pay $400 million to as many as 23 million consumers if the company is unsuccessful in appealing a ruling that found it liable for antitrust violations.<\/p>\n<p>The $400 million comes on top of earlier settlements with five publishers in the case, which provided $166 million for e-book purchasers.<\/p>\n<p>Apple agreed to the settlement in June, ahead of a damages trial set for two months later in which attorneys general in 33 states and territories and lawyers for a class of consumers were expected to seek up to $840 million.<\/p>\n<p>During Friday&#8217;s hearing, Cote said it was an &#8220;unusually structured settlement, especially for one arrived at on the eve of trial.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The deal allows Apple to continue to appeal Cote&#8217;s July 2013 ruling that Apple had violated antitrust laws by colluding with the publishers to drive up e-book prices and impede rivals such as Amazon.com.<\/p>\n<p>That accord calls for Apple to pay $400 million to consumers and $50 million to lawyers if Cote&#8217;s findings are upheld on appeal, and nothing if the Cupertino, California-based company wins its appeal.<\/p>\n<p>If the appeals court overturns Cote and returns the case to her, perhaps for a new trial, Apple would owe $50 million to consumers and $20 million to lawyers.<\/p>\n<p>While the deal was unusual, Cote said she understood why the plaintiffs decided to go with it, given delay tactics by Apple.<\/p>\n<p>An Apple spokesman did not respond to a request for comment.<\/p>\n<p>The ruling finding Apple liable followed a non-jury trial in lawsuits filed in 2012 by the U.S. Justice Department and states attorneys general against Apple and the publishers.<\/p>\n<p>The publishers include Lagardere SCA&#8217;s\u00a0Hachette Book Group Inc, News Corp&#8217;s HarperCollins Publishers LLC, Penguin Group (USA) Inc, CBS Corp&#8217;s\u00a0Simon &amp; Schuster Inc and Verlagsgruppe Georg von Holtzbrinck GmbH&#8217;s Macmillan.<\/p>\n<p>A federal appeals court is scheduled to hear Apple&#8217;s appeal Dec. 15.<\/p>\n<p>The case is In Re: Electronic Books Antitrust Litigation, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, No. 11-md-02293.<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Source: Reuters<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A U.S. judge on Friday gave final approval to Apple agreement to pay $450 million to resolve claims it harmed consumers by conspiring with five publishers to raise e-book prices. During a hearing in Manhattan, U.S. District Judge Denise Cote approved what she called a &#8220;highly unusual&#8221; accord. It calls for Apple to pay $400 [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":20,"featured_media":67450,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[18],"class_list":["post-67449","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-dr-akwasi-osei"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67449","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/20"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67449"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67449\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/67450"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67449"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67449"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67449"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}