{"id":401921,"date":"2018-02-16T16:04:21","date_gmt":"2018-02-16T16:04:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=401921"},"modified":"2018-02-16T16:04:21","modified_gmt":"2018-02-16T16:04:21","slug":"anger-google-image-search-peace-deal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=401921","title":{"rendered":"Anger at Google image search &#8216;peace deal&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Google has made it more difficult for people to save pictures from its image search product, as part of a &#8220;peace deal&#8221; with photo library Getty Images.<\/p>\n<p>In 2017, Getty Images complained to the European Commission, accusing Google of anti-competitive practices.<\/p>\n<p>Google said it had removed some features from image search, including the &#8220;view image&#8221; button.<\/p>\n<p>Getty Images said it was a &#8220;significant milestone&#8221; but critics said the move was &#8220;a step backwards&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Why did Getty Images complain?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Getty Images is a photo library that sells the work of photographers and illustrators to businesses, newspapers and broadcasters.<\/p>\n<p>It complained that Google&#8217;s image search made it easy for people to find Getty Images pictures and take them, without the appropriate permission or licence.<\/p>\n<p>Google&#8217;s image search feature had a button labelled &#8220;view image&#8221; that would open an individual picture in the web browser, making it easy to download.<\/p>\n<p>People could find and take images &#8211; albeit not in high quality and usually watermarked &#8211; without visiting the Getty Images website.<\/p>\n<p><strong>How has Google responded?<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As part of its agreement with Getty Images, the &#8220;view image&#8221; button has been removed.<\/p>\n<p>While it is still easy for people to download an image, people are now encouraged to trawl through the website it appears on to find it.<\/p>\n<p>Google said the change would &#8220;help connect users and useful websites&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Critics said the change made Google Images harder to use<br \/>\nIt also removed the &#8220;search by image&#8221; button, which was an easy way of finding larger copies of photographs.<\/p>\n<p>Getty Images said Google had also agreed to display image copyright information more prominently next to results.<\/p>\n<p><strong>&#8216;Terrible idea&#8217;<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;For those asking, yes, these changes came about in part due to our settlement with Getty Images this week,&#8221; Google said.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;They are designed to strike a balance between serving user needs and publisher concerns, both stakeholders we value.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But critics said the changes were &#8220;awful&#8221;, &#8220;user-unfriendly&#8221; and &#8220;degraded the product&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This is a terrible idea&#8230; you find an image on Google Images only for the image to be nowhere in sight,&#8221; said one user on Twitter. &#8220;Talk about destroying your own successful service.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Many suggested people should try rival image search engines such as Bing, which still have a &#8220;view image&#8221; button.<\/p>\n<p>Others pointed out that right-clicking an image in Google&#8217;s Chrome browser, and clicking &#8220;open image in new tab&#8221; replicated the missing function.<\/p>\n<p>In a statement, Getty Images said: &#8220;We are pleased to announce that after working cooperatively with Google over the past months, our concerns are being recognised and we have withdrawn our complaint.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8211;<\/p>\n<p>Source: BBC<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Google has made it more difficult for people to save pictures from its image search product, as part of a &#8220;peace deal&#8221; with photo library Getty Images. In 2017, Getty Images complained to the European Commission, accusing Google of anti-competitive practices. Google said it had removed some features from image search, including the &#8220;view image&#8221; [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":14,"featured_media":401923,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[106],"tags":[225],"class_list":["post-401921","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-technology","tag-google"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401921","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/14"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=401921"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/401921\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/401923"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=401921"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=401921"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=401921"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}