{"id":20882,"date":"2014-05-26T17:05:30","date_gmt":"2014-05-26T17:05:30","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=20882"},"modified":"2014-05-26T17:05:30","modified_gmt":"2014-05-26T17:05:30","slug":"apple-wants-retrial-in-samsung-patent-case","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=20882","title":{"rendered":"Apple wants retrial in Samsung patent case"},"content":{"rendered":"<p id=\"story_continues_1\">Apple is requesting a retrial after a Californian jury ordered Samsung to pay the US company $119m (\u00a371m) in damages for infringing two of its patents.<\/p>\n<p>Apple had been seeking damages of $2.2bn after accusing Samsung of copying five patents including the &#8220;slide to unlock function&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>The US company also filed a permanent injunction to prevent Samsung using the patents it was found to have infringed.<\/p>\n<p>Samsung filed court documents too but the contents have not been made public.<\/p>\n<p>During the original trial Apple had accused Samsung of &#8220;systematically&#8221; copying features distinctive to its iOS software. Samsung denied that it had copied Apple patents and said it was Apple who was doing the copying.<\/p>\n<p>The jury found that Apple had infringed some Samsung patents and awarded $158,000 in damages to the South Korean firm.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Litigation fatigue&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Although the jury found in Apple&#8217;s favour in respect of two of the patents, the damages awarded were much lower than the company had been seeking.<\/p>\n<p>The verdict would have been a blow for Apple said the BBC&#8217;s North America technology correspondent Richard Taylor, speaking at the time.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The figure would appear to reflect the jury&#8217;s belief that Apple&#8217;s settlement claim was unfairly inflated. Samsung argued all along that it should be far lower than the $2.2bn sought, not least because some of the patents were never even incorporated into the iPhone&#8217;s software,&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p id=\"story_continues_2\">This latest legal step is an attempt by Apple to have its damages award increased but it would require a new trial.<\/p>\n<p>Intellectual property analyst Florian Mueller thinks any new trial is unlikely to happen before an appeal of the original ruling.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;The judge may make some minor amendments to the verdict but then she&#8217;ll let the parties appeal the unfavourable parts of the ruling to the Federal Circuit. Thereafter, there may be a retrial.&#8221; he said.<\/p>\n<p>These requests by Apple mark the latest instalment in a series of legal battles over intellectual property that the world&#8217;s top two smartphone makers have been fighting for years across many countries.<\/p>\n<p>Two years ago, a separate jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $930m after finding it had used Apple technology. That verdict is still being challenged by Samsung.<\/p>\n<p>But Mr Mueller thinks Apple may be suffering &#8220;litigation fatigue&#8221;, he pointed out that Apple has not filed a US case against Samsung in more than two years.<\/p>\n<p>Apple recently settled a patent row with Google. The two companies had filed several lawsuits against one another but they agreed to dismiss these cases and said they would work together in &#8220;some areas of patent reform&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Source: BBC<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Apple is requesting a retrial after a Californian jury ordered Samsung to pay the US company $119m (\u00a371m) in damages for infringing two of its patents. Apple had been seeking damages of $2.2bn after accusing Samsung of copying five patents including the &#8220;slide to unlock function&#8221;. The US company also filed a permanent injunction to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":20883,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[18,715,445],"class_list":["post-20882","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-dr-akwasi-osei","tag-queen-janes-school","tag-rabies"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20882","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=20882"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/20882\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/20883"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=20882"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=20882"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=20882"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}