{"id":111285,"date":"2015-04-25T06:15:16","date_gmt":"2015-04-25T06:15:16","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/4cd.e16.myftpupload.com\/?p=111285"},"modified":"2015-04-25T06:17:16","modified_gmt":"2015-04-25T06:17:16","slug":"interviews-are-a-terrible-way-to-hire-psychologist","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/?p=111285","title":{"rendered":"Interviews are a terrible way to hire &#8211; Psychologist"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For years and years, the standard method for vetting job candidates has been the in-person interview.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;But as it turns out, interviews are a disastrous tool for gauging potential,&#8221; says Ron Friedman, a psychologist and author of &#8220;The Best Place To Work.&#8221;\u00a0&#8220;For one thing, it&#8217;s because over 80% of people lie during interviews. That means the information you&#8217;re collecting in an interview is suspect at best.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>But even if everything you learned in a job interview was accurate, there&#8217;d still be reason to be wary, and it&#8217;s because of the way our minds operate, he explains.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We automatically jump to all kinds of erroneous assumptions about a candidate from their appearance,&#8221; he says. &#8220;Studies show we view good looking people as more competent. We perceive tall candidates as having greater leadership potential. And we assume deep-voiced candidates are more trustworthy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>None of these evaluations are necessarily accurate, of course. &#8220;But here&#8217;s the thing,&#8221; Friedman says. &#8220;They affect the questions we ask during interviewers. And the way a question is phrased can make all the difference.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For example, if a hiring manager views you as being extroverted, they might say, &#8220;Tell me about your experience leading groups.&#8221; But if they think you&#8217;re shy or reserved, they might ask, &#8220;Are you comfortable leading groups?&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Both questions attempt to gauge your potential, but they subtly shape your responses before you&#8217;ve said a single word,&#8221; Friedman says. &#8220;And in most cases, they do so in a way that confirms my initial impression \u2014 which is typically wrong.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Friedman explains in his book that a good alternative \u2014 his &#8220;favorite technique that anyone can use to get a better read of a job candidate&#8217;s potential&#8221; \u2014 is to create a job audition, rather than an interview. &#8220;Instead of asking a job candidate questions for an hour, design a job-relevant assignment that reflects the type of work the applicant will actually do, should they be hired,&#8221; he suggests.<\/p>\n<p>For example, if you&#8217;re deciding on salespeople, have candidates sell you on your product. Or if you&#8217;re hiring web designers, have them mock up a landing page. &#8220;This way your assessment is based on actual performance, not simply how charismatic a candidate is during an interview.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The problem is, he says, hardly any companies do this because when the time comes to fill a position, most managers are scrambling to fill a vacancy. &#8220;There&#8217;s barely time to look through r\u00e9sum\u00e9s, let alone design an assignment. That&#8217;s why it&#8217;s a good idea to have your existing team design assignments today \u2014 not after they&#8217;ve found their next position,&#8221; he says. &#8220;This way you have an audition lined up when you need to make your next hire.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Source:\u00a0businessinsider.com<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>For years and years, the standard method for vetting job candidates has been the in-person interview. &#8220;But as it turns out, interviews are a disastrous tool for gauging potential,&#8221; says Ron Friedman, a psychologist and author of &#8220;The Best Place To Work.&#8221;\u00a0&#8220;For one thing, it&#8217;s because over 80% of people lie during interviews. That means [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5,"featured_media":111286,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jnews-multi-image_gallery":[],"jnews_single_post":[],"jnews_primary_category":[],"jnews_social_meta":[],"jnews_override_counter":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[36,38,21,4],"class_list":["post-111285","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","tag-corruption","tag-palaver-newspaper","tag-psychiatric","tag-st-augustines-college"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111285","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/5"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=111285"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/111285\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/111286"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=111285"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=111285"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/citifmonline.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=111285"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}